Piracy and Wikipedia
19 January 2012
—
So Wikipedia has gone dark for a day to protest about anti-copyright bills going through the Senate. Whether or not Wikipedia is right or wrong about SOPA or PIPA, it has reminded me of the frustration of the past 10 years watching these once great industries bury their heads in the sand and not move with the times.
I am very much in two minds about this.
A few points first:
1. For decades the music industry has been kind of conning the public and the musicians they represent by a) repackaging and reselling the same stuff to us over and over again whilst b) screwing the musicians and songwriters down to extraordinarily unfair recording and publishing agreements where musicians often only make 18% of the wholesale price of the record – whilst the record company takes 82% because of the expense of manufacturing and marketing the release.
2. Musicians, film makers and writers need to be paid for their work. Professionals need to be paid properly and – if we don’t – all we are doing is slowly degrading the quality of our media every day.
3. The music, TV, film and book industries have been incredibly slow at dealing with the new technology and looking out for each other.
So you could argue that the music industry deserved everything they got. However without the media industry, as inefficient as it often is, how do musicians, for example, who are generally hopeless at business, get their music heard and therefore sell records to make a living? There is a good reason why old, retired (and rightly so), bands are dragging their butts around the tour circuit yet again. Their coffers are running dry.
When iTunes launched in 2001 it was finally a way to buy music legitimately and effectively through micro-payments. Of course the music industry had slowly been decimated by nasty piracy sites, such as Napster etc., but Apple had finally given us a viable alternative to enable us to buy our music legally and inexpensively by the track. We didn’t HAVE to go in search of illegal music to put on our new Mp3 devices. Of course iTunes only really worked with the iPod at the time, but no-one really cared as the iPod was the thing we had all been waiting for. 1000 songs in your pocket!
Unfortunately companies like Sky have not learnt from this. They still put up a walled garden around their content, so if you want to watch Boardwalk Empire, for example, you have to wait until the DVD comes out or it becomes available for legal download. Of course the ardent fans are going to try to find the content they can’t buy legally via torrents and download it illegally. We don’t want to have to subscribe to a full Sky package to watch one series we enjoy. Downloading Sky’s content sends Rupert Murdoch wrinkle-free with rage, but he hasn’t moved with the times and given us viable alternatives to purchase his content. And besides, where was Sky when the music industry were ringing alarm bells? They were still selling subscription packages and newspapers. Sky lost the right to complain as it stood idly by whilst the music industry was slowly eroded, yet it was bound to happen to them too.
I passionately support the freedom of the internet, but both PIPA and SOPA sound like very ill thought through solutions to an ongoing problem – but one that does still need to be addressed. Will all the online protests work? Probably. But I am rather surprised and disappointed at the self service of sites like Wikipedia denying us access when they are unhappy when some injustice directly affects them? Why didn’t they close down over the Iraq War or China’s ongoing occupation of Tibet, or something that really means something to humanity?
We DO have to protect the freedom of the internet, but we also have to protect the creative industries that are made up of so many professional but struggling film-makers / musicians and artists who are slowly having their protection eroded away.
Of course it is great that the internet has levelled the distribution playing field, but I am not sure the complete amateurisation of our art forms is particularly good for our culture. The bar is set low and great literature, music and films, are often hard to find inall the noise and we need help to filter it out. There needs to be room for the creative amateur, but also a place for professional artists to present their work in a professional way, rather like youtube vs vimeo. The best parts of the media industry do this for us and provide us with great content to enjoy at an affordable price where we don’t feel like we are ripping off the little people.
I don’t have the answer, but international collaboration is needed between the collection societies the world over to create some kind of micro-payment system that works for us all. Maybe Wikipedia (the home of the amateur) was right to protest in this way, but instead of going dark, how about offering up a viable alternative?
Return